Effective Date: July 29, 2026
Welcome to TuhinNova. Accuracy is the foundation of responsible science journalism. This Fact-Checking Policy explains the standards and editorial practices we use to verify information before publication and, when necessary, after publication.
Science is an evolving process, and new evidence can improve or change our understanding of the natural world. Our goal is to report scientific developments accurately, responsibly, and in a way that reflects the best available evidence at the time an article is published.
Our Commitment to Accuracy
At TuhinNova, we are committed to publishing factual, well-researched, and clearly presented science journalism.
Every article is prepared with the objective of accurately representing scientific findings without exaggeration, speculation, or misleading interpretation. We strive to distinguish between established scientific knowledge, emerging research, and preliminary findings so readers can better understand the strength of the available evidence.
Although we make every reasonable effort to verify information before publication, no editorial process can guarantee that every article will remain completely accurate as scientific knowledge continues to evolve.
Our Sources
Whenever possible, our reporting is based on reliable and verifiable sources.
These may include peer-reviewed scientific journals, research papers, universities, research institutions, government agencies, scientific organizations, official mission updates, publicly available datasets, conference materials, and other credible scientific publications.
When multiple reliable sources are available, we seek to compare them to improve accuracy and provide appropriate context.
Whenever practical, we prioritize original sources over summaries or secondary reporting.
Our Verification Process
Before publication, articles undergo an editorial review intended to improve factual accuracy, clarity, consistency, and readability.
Depending on the subject matter, our review may include verification of:
- scientific terminology;
- names of researchers, institutions, and organizations;
- dates, measurements, units, and numerical data;
- quotations where applicable;
- references to published research;
- descriptions of scientific methods and findings.
Where necessary, we compare information against original research publications or official sources to reduce the risk of factual errors.
Reporting Scientific Research
Scientific studies often represent one step within a larger body of research rather than a final conclusion.
Our reporting aims to accurately explain what researchers found while avoiding conclusions that extend beyond the evidence presented.
Whenever appropriate, we seek to explain important limitations, uncertainties, sample sizes, research methods, or areas where additional investigation is still needed.
We strive to distinguish clearly between evidence reported by researchers and broader interpretations that may emerge over time.
Headlines
Our headlines are intended to reflect the substance of an article accurately.
We do not intentionally publish misleading or sensational headlines that exaggerate scientific findings or create false expectations.
Headlines are written to summarize the primary news development while remaining consistent with the evidence presented in the article.
Corrections
Despite careful editorial review, mistakes can occasionally occur.
If we discover a factual error or receive credible information indicating that published content is inaccurate, we will review the issue as promptly as reasonably possible.
When appropriate, we may correct factual inaccuracies, clarify ambiguous language, update information to reflect significant scientific developments, or revise articles where additional context improves accuracy.
Our objective is not simply to publish information but to maintain it responsibly over time.
Scientific Developments After Publication
Science advances through continued observation, experimentation, peer review, and independent verification.
Because scientific understanding changes, some information published on TuhinNova may become outdated as new evidence emerges.
When important developments substantially affect previously published reporting, we may update the relevant content to better reflect current scientific knowledge.
Reader Feedback
We value constructive feedback from readers.
If you believe an article contains a factual error, inaccurate interpretation, or misleading statement, we encourage you to contact us through our Contact page.
When reviewing reported concerns, we consider the quality and reliability of the supporting evidence before determining whether editorial action is appropriate.
Not every disagreement represents a factual error, particularly in areas where scientific discussion remains active or evidence continues to evolve.
Editorial Independence
Fact-checking decisions are made independently of outside organizations, commercial interests, advertisers, sponsors, or individuals.
Editorial judgments are based solely on the available evidence, reliable sources, and our commitment to responsible science journalism.
External organizations do not influence our verification process or editorial conclusions.
Transparency
Accuracy includes acknowledging uncertainty where it exists.
When evidence is preliminary, conflicting, or incomplete, we seek to communicate those limitations clearly rather than present uncertain findings as established scientific fact.
Transparency also means recognizing that scientific understanding evolves over time and that responsible journalism should evolve with it.
Continuous Improvement
Fact-checking is an ongoing process rather than a single step before publication.
We regularly review our editorial practices and continually seek to improve the quality, clarity, and reliability of our reporting.
As scientific publishing, journalism, and verification standards continue to develop, our editorial processes may also evolve to reflect current best practices.
Changes to This Policy
This Fact-Checking Policy may be updated from time to time to reflect improvements in our editorial standards, verification practices, legal requirements, or operational procedures.
The most current version of this Policy will always be published on this page together with its effective date.
Contact
If you have questions regarding this Fact-Checking Policy or wish to report a possible factual error, please contact us through the Contact page available on TuhinNova.
We appreciate thoughtful feedback and are committed to maintaining accurate, trustworthy, and responsible science journalism.