Effective Date: July 29, 2026
Welcome to TuhinNova. Transparency is an important part of responsible journalism. This AI Transparency Policy explains how artificial intelligence (AI) may be used in connection with our editorial workflow and, more importantly, the role AI does not play in our reporting.
As a science news publication, our responsibility is to provide readers with accurate, evidence-based, and clearly explained reporting. While AI tools may assist certain aspects of our editorial process, they do not replace editorial judgment, scientific verification, or our commitment to responsible journalism.
Our Commitment
At TuhinNova, our editorial responsibility always remains with our editorial team.
Artificial intelligence is a tool that may assist parts of our workflow, but it does not make editorial decisions, determine what we publish, establish scientific facts, or replace human review.
Every article published on TuhinNova is expected to meet our editorial standards for accuracy, clarity, fairness, and responsible science reporting.
How AI May Be Used
AI may be used to support limited editorial and production tasks that improve efficiency without replacing editorial oversight.
Depending on the circumstances, AI-assisted tools may be used for activities such as improving grammar and readability, refining sentence structure, organizing information, summarizing notes for editorial review, checking consistency in formatting, generating preliminary headline ideas, or assisting with language refinement.
Any AI-assisted output is subject to editorial review before publication and may be modified, expanded, or rejected entirely.
How AI Is Not Used
AI is not treated as an authoritative source of scientific information.
We do not intentionally rely on AI systems to determine scientific facts, interpret research without editorial review, fabricate quotations, invent sources, generate fictional scientific findings, or replace independent editorial judgment.
Published articles are not intended to be the result of fully automated content generation without meaningful human oversight.
Human Editorial Review
Human review remains an essential part of our editorial process.
Before publication, content is reviewed to improve factual accuracy, scientific clarity, readability, consistency, and compliance with our editorial standards.
Where scientific research is discussed, editorial decisions are based on available evidence and reliable sources rather than AI-generated assertions.
The responsibility for published content remains with TuhinNova, regardless of whether AI-assisted tools were used during drafting or editing.
Accuracy and Verification
Artificial intelligence can produce inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading information.
For that reason, AI-generated content is never assumed to be correct solely because it was produced by an AI system.
Scientific claims, names, dates, measurements, institutional information, and other factual material are expected to be verified through reliable sources as part of our editorial process.
When uncertainty exists, we seek to communicate that uncertainty rather than presenting unsupported information as fact.
Originality
We value original journalism and responsible editorial work.
AI may assist with language refinement or workflow efficiency, but it is not intended to replace original reporting, editorial analysis, or careful interpretation of scientific research.
Our objective is to produce content that is accurate, informative, and written in a manner that reflects our editorial standards rather than the output of an automated system.
Intellectual Property
We respect intellectual property rights and expect any AI-assisted editorial work to do the same.
When reporting on scientific research, universities, research institutions, journals, or other published works, we strive to provide appropriate attribution where applicable and to respect applicable copyright laws.
AI tools are not used as a substitute for proper sourcing or responsible editorial practices.
Transparency and Accountability
Transparency requires acknowledging the role of technology in modern publishing.
Where AI assists portions of our editorial workflow, responsibility for the final published content remains entirely with TuhinNova.
Editorial accountability cannot be delegated to software, algorithms, or automated systems.
We remain responsible for correcting verified errors, updating articles when appropriate, and maintaining the quality of our published content over time.
Continuous Evaluation
Artificial intelligence technologies continue to evolve rapidly.
We regularly evaluate how AI tools may responsibly support our editorial workflow while maintaining the principles of accuracy, fairness, transparency, and editorial independence.
Our use of AI may change as technology develops, industry standards evolve, and new legal or ethical guidance becomes available.
Changes to This Policy
We may update this AI Transparency Policy from time to time to reflect changes in technology, editorial practices, legal requirements, or operational procedures.
The most current version of this Policy will always be published on this page together with its effective date.
Contact
If you have questions regarding this AI Transparency Policy or our editorial practices, please contact us through the Contact page available on TuhinNova.
We welcome thoughtful feedback and remain committed to transparent, responsible, and trustworthy science journalism.